Tuesday 16 February 2010

The Host Nation


Having just spent the past few hours reading about South Africa's Truth and Reconciliation Commission, which was established following the Apartheid to provide a form of social justice and pave the way for a brighter future, this month I thought it apt to concentrate on the nation that will be hosting the competition in a matter of 114 days and enquire as to whether it is both physically and mentally ready to welcome the world for a few weeks.

As aforementioned, South Africa will be the first nation from the African continent to host these games and although I do not like the association of politics with football, in South Africa's case, politics is regrettably unavoidable. Still in the process of restructuring the country after the horrors of the Apartheid era, South Africa has come a long way from the oppressive 1960s, 70s and 80s. Yet, the question needs to be asked, just how far has it come?

In one of the articles I was reading, about the TRC, it stated the commonly held view that "Johannesburg is the most dangerous city in the world". Crime rates in South Africa are certainly one of the highest in the world; the murder rate per 100,000 is 38.6% in comparison to that of 1.43% for England and Wales. South Africa also has one of the highest rates of rape in the world. What is the point of all these statistics? Well, it's to show that South Africa still has a long way to go in the process of reconstruction; crime is still an important issue, so much so that the security company G4S has refused to work at the games. The security of the players, officials, fans etc. has to be South Africa's number one priority if they are to succeed in pulling off a spectacular tournament. Danny Jordaan has ensured the world's media, that he and his team have done everything they can to make the tournament as safe as possible. 1.3 billion Rand has been invested by the government for security purposes only and the South African government has promised that this is sufficient funding for top-of-the range, sophisticated security measures.

It seems a long time ago that South Africa isolated itself from the sporting world and refused to allow multi-racial teams to play in the country. A few decades later and it is getting ready to welcome the whole world - including teams of players from all different races, cultures, walks of life - to come together in the name of football. This is significant in itself, in that it is representing the new post-Apartheid South Africa, emerging from the ashes of war, in a bid to try and engage with the rest of the world in order to make up for all those years of isolation. South Africa has progressed in its racial equality movements but this is not to say that racism and the strong prejudices of time gone by, have been entirely eradicated in South African society. Nevertheless, South Africa wants to show the world that it has been able to change and emerge from apartheid a stronger nation. In my view, hosting one of the world's greatest and most celebrated tournaments, couldn't be a better platform to do so.

Danny Jordaan himself was an anti-Apartheid activist and he perfectly captured the expectations of the nation of South Africa, when he stated that first the dream was for a "non-racial, democratic society...then, as sports fans, that one day South Africa would be a member of Fifa, after being expelled in 1976. And finally, we dreamt that the country would host the World Cup one day".

South Africa still has a long way to go in fulfilling its visions for the future, but football, and sport in general, has that special power to somehow bring people together in their shared love and enthusiasm for the game. Expectations are high and thus South Africa must deliver on behalf of its people and on behalf of the rest of the world.

Sunday 7 February 2010

EURO 2012 DRAWS


Ironically, in Saturday's rehearsal for the draws, the ROI did actually draw France!!! So it's going to be interesting to see what the results of the real draw will be. I am writing this as the draw is taking place live in Warsaw...

Here we go:

GROUP A:
Azerbaijan
Kazakhstan
Belgium
Austria
Turkey
Germany

GROUP B:
Andorra
Armenia
Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia
REPUBLIC OF IRELAND
Slovakia
Russia

GROUP C:
Faroe Islands
Estonia
Slovenia
NORTHERN IRELAND
Serbia
Italy

GROUP D:
Luxembourg
Albania
Belarus
Bosnia-Herzegovina
Romania
France

GROUP E:
San Marino
Moldova
Hungary
Finland
Sweden
The Netherlands

GROUP F:
Malta
Georgia
Latvia
Israel
Greece
Croatia

GROUP G:
Montenegro
WALES
Bulgaria
Switzerland
ENGLAND

GROUP H:
Iceland
Cyprus
Norway
Denmark
Portugal

GROUP I:
Lichtenstein
Lithuania
SCOTLAND
Czech Republic
Spain

Well that's the end of the draws for qualifying.

In Group A, Germany will play their neighbours Austria and seem to be the favourites to win their group.

The ROI will face challenging opponents in Russia, even though they did not qualify for this year's World Cup, but will be gutted not to have been given the opportunity for revenge against France.

Northern Ireland have been handed a very tough group against Serbia, Slovenia and World Cup winners Italy in Group C - possibly the Group of Death?

In Group D, France can think themselves lucky after having drawn a favourable group, so they should be able to qualify a lot more smoothly than they did this year.

The Netherlands will be firm favourites to finish top off Group E after a flawless qualifying campaign for the 2010 World Cup, however Sweden will be looking to challenge in order to secure a place at the 2012 tournament, after narrowly missing out on this year's finals.

Surprising victors of Euro 2004, Greece, will be facing tricky games against Croatia and currently, manager-less Israel.

In Group G, England will indeed play Wales and are lucky because they won't have to do as much travelling after being drawn into one of the three, 5-team groups. England look like the favourites to qualify top in that group.

Group H takes on a distinctive Scandinavian feel with Iceland, Norway and Denmark all competing against each other. Denmark have been improving markedly and will come up against Portugal once again in the group stage, after beating them to the top spot in their qualifying group for South Africa.

Finally, Scotland will face a stern test against the Czech Republic and the current European champions Spain in what appears to be yet another tough group.


NB: Here's yet another example of politics and its unwanted involvement in football. Both Georgia and Russia, and Armenia and Azerbaijan were forcibly kept apart in these draws which is why when Armenia was drawn into Group A, the draw was changed so that it could be placed into Group B. This was all decided before the draw took place after consultation with the appropriate national bodies as concerns were raised about security. The well-documented South Ossetia war in 2008 between Georgia and Russia meant the two countries refused to offer security for the opposition. The situation was much the same for Azerbaijan and Armenia who have been engaged in an undeclared war for quite sometime. UEFA released a statement declaring that the whole purpose of, what is essentially manipulating, the draw was to prevent politics from entering into the realm of football, but surely by reacting to the political situations and changing the draw so that the teams cannot face each other brings politics into the footballing arena anyway? If they are trying to prove that politics and football should not mix, then they are surely going about it the wrong way as it is having the opposite effect. By not allowing the teams to face each other they are allowing politics to dominate football. This has some obvious resonance with the Angola article I blogged earlier. In my opinion, it is setting a bad precedent and there are better solutions that UEFA can employ to ensure that politics is excluded from football, for example by playing at a neutral venue or playing behind closed doors. The theme for the Euro 2012 tournament is "Making History Together", however, one can be forgiven for being slightly sceptical of that motto.

Friday 5 February 2010

EURO 2012


The draws for Euro 2012 are being made, this coming Sunday 7th February at 11:00 GMT.

England have been placed into Pot A, along with current champions, Spain and there is a real chance that England could be facing Wales and either Scotland or the Republic of Ireland in the qualifying group stage.

There is also the possibility of France (who are also in Pot A), playing the Republic of Ireland in the groups as well, in what would surely be deemed the "Revenge Matches"; it would certainly prove for some excellent viewing, that's for sure!

The main tournament is due to take place in Poland and Ukraine and the qualifying stage will kick off in September 2010 in a bid to try and remedy our World Cup blues.

The draw itself takes place in Poland, in the elegantly named Palace of Culture and Science, located in the capital, Warsaw, so tune in to find out who will be facing who!

England Captaincy




Well, it seems that Fabio Capello has made a decision regarding the issue that has been dominating both the front and back pages of the papers this week - whether Terry should remain captain of England or whether he should be stripped of the honour.

Capello has, in my opinion, rightly, decided to take control of the situation before it can deteriorate any further and after talking to Terry, has decided to strip him of his captaincy. I, like many other supporters fully back his decision not based on moral grounds but on football grounds as this is what the decision is based on after all. However, there are some who believe it's the wrong decision. One fan on the BBC Sports Website, believes the decision is ridiculous and we should not care about what goes on in Terry's private life. Yes, we shouldn't but when it concerns the England team who are preparing to enter a World Cup tournament and when Terry's private life also concerns that of another teammate, then we should care, for the well-being of the team.

In my opinion, Capello's handling of the situation exemplifies his no-nonsense, hard-nosed character and his serious attitude to the job and he is just the type of manager that England need but have been lacking in previous years. This is not to say that previous England managers were not serious enough, but Capello has the distinct knack of being able to manage the players as footballers and as people too. He demands respect and he gets it, more so than other managers who have held the same post before. There is no doubt in my mind that he is the right man to ensure that the England boys concentrate solely on the football side of things and Terry really can blame no one but himself for Capello's decision.

The question therefore remains as to who will be the next England captain. Rio Ferdinand is the hot favourite; he is currently England's vice-captain but lately a string of injuries has prevented him from playing regularly for Manchester United. There is also Steven Gerrard, however concerns have been raised regarding the charges made against him for assault last year. David Beckham has not been mentioned as such because he is not a regular for the England team. Whoever becomes captain, however, will shoulder a lot of responsibility and they will have to make sure they don't make the same mistakes as John Terry and allow private matters to extend to the pitch, if they are to be successful in their role as leader of the national side.

Monday 1 February 2010

John Terry


It appears that John Terry has been scoring away from home on two fronts; however whilst he was able to help Chelsea's title charge by grabbing a late winner against Burnley on Saturday, he put his future as England captain in jeopardy and also seems to have put England manager, Fabio Capello in a problematic situation.

First things first - with regards to the legal injunction that was imposed but then overturned - questions have been raised by those who believe that by overturning it, it was an invasion of privacy. However, the situation extends beyond John Terry's alleged affairs. His actions, as captain of England, have implications for the team itself and for the tournament in South Africa. Therefore, I believe it was right to overturn the injunction because it is no longer about one man, it is about the team. Also, the fact that Terry applied for an injunction in the first place, has created more publicity than would have been generated had he not done so.

Excluding morality and stripping the situation away from anything but football we are left with several problems because John Terry's liaison just happened to be with the former girlfriend of his ex-Chelsea teammate and fellow England player, Wayne Bridge. Fortunately for John Terry, Wayne Bridge no longer plays for Chelsea otherwise Carlo Ancelotti would be in a similar situation to Fabio Capello. With the team selection for the World Cup looming ever closer, Capello will be mindful of the situation and will have to make a decision regarding captaincy sooner rather than later. Ashley Cole seems like the first-choice left back for England at this moment in time, but he came off injured on Saturday and there is no doubt that Capello will be taking along a reserve left-back - most likely to be Wayne Bridge. Therefore, this begs the question, will Wayne Bridge be happy to play under the captaincy of Terry? They won't be playing too far apart on the pitch either, inevitably they will have to communicate and ensure the England defence holds firm. Of course, both players are professionals but it helps if you get on with your fellow teammates.

The situation poses a big threat to the spirit of the England team - Wayne Bridge appears to be a very popular member of the squad and Terry's actions have already resulted in warring factions with 'Team Terry' and 'Team Bridge' taking opposite sides. In addition, as captain and as a professional, Terry is supposed to be an example not only to his teammates but also to the younger generation of footballers. This latest string of revelations about the defender's private life will have done a massive amount of damage to his reputation both as a footballer, and as a role model.

There have been suggestions that Terry should do the 'right thing' and give up his captaincy so that Fabio Capello is no longer put in an awkward position. I tend to agree with this. Terry has already threatened the spirit of the England team enough, the best thing he can do to redeem the situation now is let Capello decide what can be done without being stuck in a problematic position. This may ease the tension in the dressing room somewhat as both footballers, no doubt, have friends in common who are also stuck in an awkward position. After all, it was his and only his own actions that put him in the position he finds himself in now with regards to his future role as captain. Only then, can Terry begin to somewhat salvage his damaged reputation.